I’ve been to the cinema four times so far this year. Now I have a loyalty card, I’m quite keen to go. They’ve suckered me into it well.
I went off the cinema quite severely after working in one. It wouldn’t be fair to judge all cinemas on the one I worked in, and The Distaste wasn’t that it opened The Eyes to the callous business attitude where the actual films don’t matter at all, or the appalling low standards of hygiene, or how badly the staff are treated. I just didn’t enjoy the experience any more. Who wants to sit in a smelly room in uncomfortable seats, surrounded by strangers who cough and chatter and rustle all the way through the film and do their best of block your view? You can’t talk to your friends, it’s so loud it hurts the ears, you’re often craning at an uncomfortable angle and if you miss something, there’s no rewind or subtitle option. The only appeal seems to be that it’s big, and I’m not so credulous that I fall for ‘bigger means better’.
But then something amazing happened.
In October 2010, Back To The Future was re-released at cinemas for the 25th anniversary. And NO ONE told me. It was only after it had been out for a month that I heard about it. My all-time favourite film was being shown in a medium I had never been able to view it in and NO ONE TOLD ME?
I scrambled to action, searching everywhere and found a cinema still showing it. It was far away, but not too far away, not for a once-in-a-lifetime experience. The Housemate and I jumped into the car and headed out into the unknown.
We got there eventually, although there were several embarrassing moments of
It was the swankiest cinema I’ve ever seen.
It was the greatest cinematic experience of The Life. I’d actually become a little bored of Back To The Future. Do you know how to cure ‘I’ve seen this film a hundred times’ syndrome? Watch it on a giant screen with an audience who are all there because they have spent twenty-five years loving the film. It was like seeing it for the first time. I don’t even remember seeing it for the first time. Even though I knew every second of the film better than I know my own reflection, each second was brand new. It was at once comfortingly familiar and excitingly fresh. It was beautiful. Only better, better. It was a group experience, community spirit, strangers brought together by a shared love. We all laughed a split second before each joke. We were one. We were happy. And at the end, there was an awkward pause, because we all wanted it, but it’s the cinema, you don’t do that at the cinema, and then we couldn’t hold it in, and we applauded.
And I’ve had a new respect for the cinema ever since.
So far this year I have seen:
The Woman In Black
The Pirates! In An Adventure With Scientists!
Marvel Avengers Assemble
I’ll now try to assemble some thoughts on each. I have difficulty critically appraising what I’ve seen without coming off negative. I think it stems from writing workshops. Because when a story works, when it’s good, that’s like the base level. That’s what it should be. You don’t want to change that stuff, so you leave it alone and focus on what does need changing. The other reason is because I don’t know how to describe good things. It’s much easier to articulate fault. Merit ends up being a dull string of adjectives.
First off, am I a fan of the Muppets generally? I don’t know.
I do find them funny, but I’m not quite sure what it is that I like them in. I’ve always liked Kermit, but beyond that… I’ve seen seven Muppet films (not including this one), the 4D ride and the first six episodes of the Muppet Show, and I want to like them a lot more than I actually do. The Muppets are funny, very funny, but the films tend to be uneven, the show has way too many straight pieces and if I have to see Kermit and Miss Piggy get together one more time…
But since I don’t think I’ve seen a Muppets film at the cinema before, it seemed like the done thing to go see this one.
And I did like it. It was funny. But it was definitely uneven.
At first I was surprised that it focused on Walter and Gary, rather than on the Muppets, but I was quickly absorbed by their story. They’ve grown up in a whimsical small town where they cheesily burst into song all the time. They’re totally nostalgically obsessed with the Muppets and rely too much on each other so that they’ve never really grown up. This section was all gold. I would happily watch a film of that stuff.
But then Walter and Gary go to the big city, find out the Muppet theatre is going to get torn down and have to reunite the Muppets to put on a show to save the theatre. This is pretty much the same plot as at least three of the previous Muppet films. I know it’s meant to be nostalgic, but this is getting lazy. It was still good though. Even if Jason Segel can’t stop smiling even during emotional bits, there weren’t enough (non-ballad) songs and it denies the existence of the nineties, y’know, that decade I grew up in, which puts me firmly in the ‘I can’t believe Rizzo didn’t have any lines’ camp.
The problem was is this a Walter film or a Muppets film? I’d happily watch either, but not both at the same time. The film stretched one way, then the other, so that neither character group got the screen time, focus or development that they deserved. Even so, it was still good enough that a great ending could have saved it.
The ending was lame.
I did like the film, I did, I just wish I could have liked it more.
The Woman In Black
Why did I go to see The Woman In Black?
1. Because everyone I’ve ever met has been going on about the play for years, but I’ve never been able to find it in me to spend a lot of money to see a serious play, so I thought watching the film would be a cheap alternative.
2. Because I’d just watched eight Harry Potter films in a row and then I went outside and saw Daniel Radcliffe’s face on a poster for a new film and I thought it would be a funny idea to see it.
3. I wanted to see whether Daniel Radcliffe can act.
4. I liked the poster. An attractive man in Edwardian dress – what’s not to like?
Did I regret The Decision?
Yes, pretty soon into the film, I remembered that a) I don’t like horror films because of my overactive imagination, b) I don’t cope well with seeing people getting killed, c) I’m terrified of ghosts.
Did it scare me?
No. It isn’t a scare film, it’s a jump film. When water bursts out of a tap in an early scene and I nearly had a heart attack on the way back down from the ceiling, I realised I was going to have to steel myself a bit better.
Did it make me jump?
Not much after the first time. All the jump moments are childishly obvious – anyone who falls for the old looking through a peephole trick needs their wits tested – so I worked out that when a jump was approaching, if I looked at the bottom of the screen I could still see what was going on above me, but it was removed enough not to make me flinch. The audience were very entertaining though, shrieking and giggling throughout.
Did I enjoy it?
Well, I liked the vista, as clearly did the cinematographer, and I enjoyed the atmospheric stuff. But there’s no intelligence or skill in this:
And that’s all the film amounts to.
Daniel Radcliffe was cute, and I had great fun watching Mr Rochester.
But I don’t see the point in ghost stories. I’d prefer a detective story, where the characters can actually achieve something. When it comes to ghosts, you know the ending will never be satisfying. And the woman in black is a total bitch.
Did it scare me?
I already said no.
Not while it was on.
The Pirates! In An Adventure With Scientists!
A lot of The Friends got very excited about this film coming out, but I missed why. I saw two different trailers and neither inspired me much. But it’s Aardman, y’know, you have to support Aardman. I’d be betraying my Feathers McGraw pencil case if I didn’t.
Plus I got the idea somewhere that The Housemate wanted to see it.
So we went to see it.
And it was awesome.
Also, children stink.
It looked good, it was really funny and the voice cast were brilliant. The Pirate Captain was a triumph of a character – absolutely perfect. The Pirates had a lovely familial rapport and were so likeable. Although I knew nothing about this universe and didn’t even know there was a whole series of books, as soon as I was watching the film, I felt like I knew these characters, that we’d been on adventures before, it all felt… right. I don’t know whether it’ll stand up to repeat viewings (The Were-Rabbit certainly didn’t) but I hope so. I’m really looking forward to the next instalment.
Marvel Avengers Assemble
I’m not much of a superhero geek. I can’t get The Head around comics.
And my interest in superheroes isn’t piqued beyond Lois & Clark and X-Men Legends. So a team of Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Captain America, Thor, Black Widow and Hawkeye didn’t exactly thrill me, particularly since I’d only seen half the films leading up to it. They didn’t sucker me into that.
But actually Avengers worked okay. Sure, Thor was actually MORE boring than I had expected (one funny line in entire film), and so was Captain
(two funny bits in entire film), but the script seemed to be aware of that. And sure, nothing happened for the middle section of the film, the baddies were ill-defined and clichéd, the plot basic and obvious, but it’s a team up superhero flick. I don’t hold with letting a film off faults based on genre… but it’s a superhero team up flick. If you’re gonna moan about stuff like that, don’t go and see it. It’s like going to see the sixth film in a franchise and moaning because you didn’t like the first one. Well you knew that going in, so you can only blame yourself. America
Avengers was exciting and funny. It actually did pretty well with the ensemble nature of the cast, which is really impressive, it knew its strengths (Iron Man), having civilians mixed up in the finale made it feel like it actually meant something and it didn’t always focus of Scarlett Johansson’s bottom (although Agent Hill’s uniform was suspiciously tighter than any other member of S.H.I.E.L.D. (it must have shrunk in the wash) and Pepper Potts wears cut-off short shorts now).
I couldn’t get a handle on Loki, not because he spends most of the film standing in a room smirking like this is part of some grand plan even though it goes nowhere, but because when your bad guy is wittier than half the heroes (and in some cases, a better actor), he ends up being more likeable, but I’m pretty sure I’m not meant to like him, because he kept killing people (one of whom is a character who is more entertaining than four of the leads put together, killed seemingly just to make the name ‘Avengers’ make sense, so thanks for that). I even liked his helmet, because it covered his stupid haircut.
What do I think of a team of Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Captain
, Thor, Black Widow and Hawkeye now? America
This was definitely a good ride for fans of Iron Man (Avengers far surpassed the lame Iron Man 2), but fans of Thor must surely be disappointed. Because apparently, there are fans of Thor. Still, for me, the balance of characters worked very well. Iron Man was brilliant (clearly being able to fly is the most important superpower). The Hulk was handled so well that I never got bored of him. Black Widow and Hawkeye were inoffensive (though I’m unclear on where S.H.I.E.L.D. ends and the Avengers begin). Captain
was utterly bland, never progressing further than a soldier drone. Thor was actively dull. But I only zoned out once. America
So for what it was, it was fun. Which probably means that if you actually like this kind of thing, you’ll love it.
The worst film I’ve seen at the cinema so far this year was The Woman In Black, which never rose above someone jumping out of a cupboard and going ‘boo!’
The Muppets was entertaining, but not as good as it should have been given the cast of characters.
Marvel Avengers Assemble was entertaining, and better than it should have been given the cast of characters.
But the best film I’ve seen at the cinema this year is definitely The Pirates! In An Adventure With Scientists!